up: refactor, text requirements, fre, text contribution
This commit is contained in:
parent
12b5932f65
commit
d7b84b1699
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
|
|||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Collection of available actuation forces for different keyswitch manufacturers}
|
\subsection{Collection of available actuation forces for different keyswitch manufacturers}
|
||||||
\label{sec:a2}
|
\label{app:keyswitch}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To gather information about available actuation forces, the product lines of
|
To gather information about available actuation forces, the product lines of
|
||||||
keyswitches for all well known manufacturers, namely Cherry, Kailh, Gateron,
|
keyswitches for all well known manufacturers, namely Cherry, Kailh, Gateron,
|
||||||
|
195
chap0/sec1.tex
195
chap0/sec1.tex
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||||||
% Chapter 0 - Proposal
|
% Chapter 0 - Proposal
|
||||||
% Section 1 - Motivation, problem statement and thesis objectives
|
% Section 1 - Motivation, problem statement and thesis objectives
|
||||||
\section{Bachelor Thesis Proposal - Philip Gaber}
|
\section{Bachelor Thesis Proposal - Philip Gaber}
|
||||||
{\huge Impact of personalized, per key, actuation force on efficiency and satisfaction while using mechanical keyboards}
|
{\huge Impact of adjusted, per key, actuation force on efficiency and satisfaction while using mechanical keyboards}
|
||||||
\subsection{Motivation}
|
\subsection{Motivation}
|
||||||
In recent years, computers are used to some extend in almost every industry in
|
In recent years, computers are used to some extend in almost every industry in
|
||||||
Europe \cite{eurostat_ent_w_comp} and China \cite{iresearch_ent_w_comp}. This
|
Europe \cite{eurostat_ent_w_comp} and China \cite{iresearch_ent_w_comp}. This
|
||||||
@ -11,46 +11,55 @@ computers in corporations. Furthermore, according to a statistic published by
|
|||||||
access to at least one computer \cite{itu_hh_w_comp}. One of the most used
|
access to at least one computer \cite{itu_hh_w_comp}. One of the most used
|
||||||
devices for data input while operating a computer is the keyboard
|
devices for data input while operating a computer is the keyboard
|
||||||
\parencite[22]{handbook_chi}. Therefore, people who use a computer, either at
|
\parencite[22]{handbook_chi}. Therefore, people who use a computer, either at
|
||||||
home or to fulfill certain tasks at work, are also likely to use a
|
home or to fulfill certain tasks at work, are also likely to use a keyboard. An
|
||||||
keyboard. There are also different mechanisms which are used in keyboard keys to
|
important part of a keyboard is the keyswitch also called keyboard key or
|
||||||
determine if a key is pressed. More commonly used mechanism to date are scissor
|
key. Those keyswitches use, depending on the manufacturer or keyboard type,
|
||||||
switches, mostly used in laptop keyboards, dome/membrane switches, often used in
|
different mechanisms to actuate a keypress. More commonly used mechanism to date
|
||||||
low- to mid-priced keyboards, and mechanical switches which are the main switch
|
are scissor switches, mostly used in laptop keyboards, dome/membrane switches,
|
||||||
type for high-priced and gaming keyboards \cite{ergopedia_keyswitch}. Depending
|
often used in low- to mid-priced keyboards, and mechanical switches which are
|
||||||
on the mechanism and type of key used, it is possible that different force has
|
the main switch type for high-priced and gaming keyboards
|
||||||
to be applied to the key to activate it. Normally, the force required to
|
\cite{ergopedia_keyswitch}. Depending on the mechanism and type of key used, it
|
||||||
activate a key is identical for each key across the keyboard. However, previous
|
is possible that different force has to be applied to the key to activate
|
||||||
research has shown, that there is a disparity in force generated by different
|
it. Normally, the force required to activate a key is identical for each key
|
||||||
fingers \cite{bretz_finger_force}. This raises the question, why there are no
|
across the keyboard. However, previous research has shown, that there is a
|
||||||
keyboards with adjusted actuation forces per finger or even customizable
|
disparity in force generated by different fingers
|
||||||
keyboards, where an individual can select the actuation force for each
|
\cite{bretz_finger_force}. This raises the question, why there are no keyboards
|
||||||
keyswitch.
|
with adjusted actuation forces per finger or even customizable keyboards, where
|
||||||
|
an individual can select the actuation force for each keyswitch individually.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Proposed Objective, Research Question and Hypothesis}
|
\subsection{Proposed Objective, Research Question and Hypothesis}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This thesis is intended to provide an overview of already conducted research in
|
% This thesis is intended to provide an overview of already conducted research in
|
||||||
the domain of keyboards, especially in connection with actuation force and the
|
% the domain of keyboards, especially in connection with actuation force and the
|
||||||
impact of different keyswitches on keyboard users.
|
% impact of different keyswitches on keyboard users.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Because there is no previous research in the particular field of per finger/key
|
% Because there is no previous research in the particular field of per finger/key
|
||||||
actuation force for (mechanical) keyboards and the impact of such customization
|
% actuation force for (mechanical) keyboards and the impact of such customization
|
||||||
on efficiency and comfort, this thesis is also intended to research if this is a
|
% on efficiency and comfort, this thesis is also intended to research if this is a
|
||||||
viable option in comparison to the classic keyboard with uniform actuation
|
% viable option in comparison to the classic keyboard with uniform actuation
|
||||||
force. Therefore the author proposes to answer the question:
|
% force. Therefore the author proposes to answer the question:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This thesis is intended to research if a keyboard with zones of keys, which have
|
||||||
|
adjusted actuation force depending on the assigned finger for that zone and the
|
||||||
|
position on the keyboard, is a viable option compared to the standard keyboard
|
||||||
|
with uniform actuation force across all keyswitches.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{tabular}{p{0.3cm} p{0.5cm} p{13cm} p{0.5cm}}
|
\begin{tabular}{p{0.3cm} p{0.5cm} p{13cm} p{0.5cm}}
|
||||||
& \textbf{\large RQ} & {\Large Does a personalized, per key, actuation force have a positive impact on efficiency and satisfaction?} & \\
|
& \textbf{\large RQ} & {\Large Does an adjusted actuation force per key have a positive impact on efficiency and overall satisfaction while using a mechanical keyboard?} & \\
|
||||||
\end{tabular}
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
\vspace{1em}
|
\vspace{1em}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% TODO: Dissatisfied statt comfort da hohe error rate und dadurch frustriert
|
||||||
|
% TODO: Bei hypothesen noch error rate bei geschwindigkeit mit einbeziehen
|
||||||
|
% ASK: Doch noch comfort mit einbeziehen?
|
||||||
\begin{longtable}{p{0.3cm} p{0.5cm} p{13cm} p{0.5cm}}
|
\begin{longtable}{p{0.3cm} p{0.5cm} p{13cm} p{0.5cm}}
|
||||||
& \textbf{H1} & Lower key actuation force improves typing speed over higher key actuation force and therefore enhances efficiency. & \\
|
& \textbf{H1} & Lower key actuation force improves typing speed over higher key actuation force (efficiency - speed). & \\
|
||||||
& & & \\
|
& & & \\
|
||||||
& \textbf{H2} & Higher key actuation force decreases typing errors compared to lower key actuation force, which improves efficiency. & \\
|
& \textbf{H2} & Higher key actuation force decreases typing errors compared to lower key actuation force (efficiency - error rate). & \\
|
||||||
& & & \\
|
& & & \\
|
||||||
& \textbf{H3} & Keys with lower actuation force are perceived as more satisfactory to write with then keys with higher actuation force. & \\
|
& \textbf{H3} & Keys with lower actuation force are perceived as more satisfactory to write with than keys with higher actuation force. & \\
|
||||||
& & & \\
|
& & & \\
|
||||||
& \textbf{H4} & Users perform better and feel more satisfied while using Keyboards with personalized/adjusted key actuation force then without the personalization/adjustment. & \\
|
& \textbf{H4} & Users perform better and feel more satisfied while using Keyboards with adjusted key actuation force than without the adjustment. & \\
|
||||||
\end{longtable}
|
\end{longtable}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -60,8 +69,8 @@ force. Therefore the author proposes to answer the question:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Main target group to recruit participants for the research study from are
|
Main target group to recruit participants for the research study from are
|
||||||
personal contacts and fellow students. It is planned to recruit ~20 participants
|
personal contacts and fellow students. It is planned to recruit ~20 participants
|
||||||
in total. Participants are required to type with more than just one
|
in total. Participants are required to type with more than just one finger per
|
||||||
finger. Therefore touch typing is not a mandatory but helpful skill to
|
hand. Thus, touch typing is not a mandatory but helpful skill to
|
||||||
participate. The age distribution for the subjects is estimated to be between 18
|
participate. The age distribution for the subjects is estimated to be between 18
|
||||||
and 56 years. The average typing speed should be known prior to the main
|
and 56 years. The average typing speed should be known prior to the main
|
||||||
experiment. Therefore, a typing speed test should be performed on the subject's
|
experiment. Therefore, a typing speed test should be performed on the subject's
|
||||||
@ -73,7 +82,36 @@ study.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Study design}
|
\subsection{Study design}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The experiment should consist of a experimental group and a control group. The text used for the typing test should be easily understandable. Therefore the text has to be evaluated with the help of a Flesch-Kncaid scala (understandability of text).
|
The experiment should consist of a experimental group and a control group. The
|
||||||
|
control group will perform all typing tests with the same keyboard. The text
|
||||||
|
used for the typing test should be easily understandable. Therefore, the text
|
||||||
|
has to be evaluated with the help of a Flesch-Kincaid scala \cite{flesch_fre}
|
||||||
|
adjusted for German language \cite{amstad_fre}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}\label{fre_german}
|
||||||
|
FRE_{deutsch} = 180 - \underbrace{ASL}_{\mathclap{\text{Average Sentence Length}}} - (58,5 * \overbrace{ASW}^{\mathclap{\text{Average Syllables per Word}}})
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The adjusted formula (\ref{fre_german}) to estimate the understandability of the
|
||||||
|
texts used in this experiment usually yields a number in the range of
|
||||||
|
\([0;100]\) called the \gls{FRE}. Higher \gls{FRE}s refer to better
|
||||||
|
understandability and thus the texts used in this experiment all have to fulfill
|
||||||
|
the requirement of a \gls{FRE} \(> 60\) which represents a standard text
|
||||||
|
\cite{amstad_fre} and \cite{flesch_fre}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One typing test will consist of several smaller, randomly chosen, texts
|
||||||
|
snippets. The length of the snippets has to be between 100 and 400 characters
|
||||||
|
and a snippet has meet the \gls{FRE} requirement. The snippets are generated by
|
||||||
|
volunteers via the web interface of the platform used in this experiment which
|
||||||
|
can be seen in Figure \ref{gott:contribute_text}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=0.42\textwidth]{images/gott_contribute_text.png}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Go TyingTest (GoTT) - Text contribution section }
|
||||||
|
\label{gott:contribute_text}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% ASK: Should there be a control group at all, if so should they use their own keyboard or always the same random keyboard while they think they are testing different keyswitches?
|
% ASK: Should there be a control group at all, if so should they use their own keyboard or always the same random keyboard while they think they are testing different keyswitches?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -81,60 +119,73 @@ The experiment should consist of a experimental group and a control group. The t
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
\item Pre-Test questionnaire to gather demographic and other relevant
|
\item Pre-Test questionnaire to gather demographic and other relevant
|
||||||
information (age, gender, dominant hand, touch typing experience, average
|
information e.g., touch typist, average \gls{KB} usage per day and previous
|
||||||
\gls{KB} usage per day, previous medical conditions affecting the result of
|
medical conditions affecting the result of the study \gls{RSI}, \gls{CTS},
|
||||||
the study -> \gls{RSI}, \gls{CTS}, etc.) (5 min)
|
etc. (5 min)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% ASK: Medical conditions OK?
|
% ASK: Medical conditions OK?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\item Adjustment of test environment (Chair height, monitor height, etc.) (2 min)
|
\item Adjustment of test environment (Chair height, monitor height, etc.) (2 min)
|
||||||
\item Familiarization with the typing test (5 min)
|
\item Familiarization with the typing test (5 min)
|
||||||
\item \textbf{Main-Test part 1 (H1-H3):} Typing tests (2x 5 min per \gls{KB} +
|
\item Familiarization with the keyboard (5 min)
|
||||||
5 min break in between tests) with different actuation forces for the whole
|
\item \textbf{Main-Test part 1 (H1-H3):} In this part the subject has to take
|
||||||
keyboard (35 \gls{g}, 50 \gls{g}, 80 \gls{g}). These specific values are the
|
two, 5 minute, typing tests per keyboard, with a total of 3 keyboards
|
||||||
results of a self conducted comparison between the product lines of most major
|
(\gls{KB} A, \gls{KB} B, \gls{KB} C). After each typing test, the subject has
|
||||||
keyswitch manufacturers. The results show, that the lowest average force for
|
to fill out the post typing test keyboard comfort questionnaire. Each keyboard
|
||||||
keyswitches available is 35 \gls{g}, the highest average force is 80 \gls{g},
|
is equipped with one set of keyswitches and therefore provides one of the
|
||||||
and the most common offered force is 50 \gls{g}. The keyboard has an ISO type
|
following, uniform, actuation forces across the whole keyboard: 35 \gls{g}, 50
|
||||||
and QWERTZ layout to match the subjects day-to-day layout and keyboard
|
\gls{g} or 80 \gls{g}. These specific values are the results of a self
|
||||||
format. The keyboard uses mechanical keyswitches which are hot-pluggable and
|
conducted comparison between the product lines of most major keyswitch
|
||||||
therefore can be changed after each typing test while participants take a
|
manufacturers. The results shown in appendix \ref{app:keyswitch} yield, that
|
||||||
break. The order for the keyswitch actuation forces and texts for the
|
the lowest broadly available force for keyswitches is 35 \gls{g}, the highest
|
||||||
|
broadly available force is 80 \gls{g}, and the most common offered force is 50
|
||||||
|
\gls{g}. The keyboards used in this experiment are visually identical, ISO/IEC
|
||||||
|
9995-1 conform \cite{iso9995-1} and provide a \gls{QWERTZ} layout to match the subjects
|
||||||
|
day-to-day layout and keyboard format. All keyboards are equipped with linear
|
||||||
|
mechanical keyswitches from one manufacturer to minimize differences in haptic
|
||||||
|
and sound while typing. The order for the keyboards and texts for the
|
||||||
individual tests is randomized and across subjects counterbalanced to mitigate
|
individual tests is randomized and across subjects counterbalanced to mitigate
|
||||||
order effects \cite{statist_counterbalancing}. \textbf{(total: 60 min)}
|
order effects \cite{statist_counterbalancing}. \textbf{(total: 65 min)}
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
\item First typing test (15 min)
|
\item First typing test with \gls{KB} A (5 min) \\
|
||||||
\item Change of keyswitches + follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
\item Second typing test (15 min)
|
\item Second typing test with \gls{KB} A (5 min) \\
|
||||||
\item Change of keyswitches + follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
\item Third typing test (15 min)
|
\item First typing test with \gls{KB} B (5 min) \\
|
||||||
\item Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
|
\item Second typing test with \gls{KB} B (5 min) \\
|
||||||
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
|
\item First typing test with \gls{KB} C (5 min) \\
|
||||||
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
|
\item Second typing test with \gls{KB} C (5 min) \\
|
||||||
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
\item \textbf{Main-Test part 2 (H4):} Another typing test to compare the
|
\item \textbf{Main-Test part 2 (H4):} Another typing test to compare the
|
||||||
results of keyboards with uniform actuation force to keyboards with adjusted
|
results of keyboards with uniform actuation force to keyboards with adjusted
|
||||||
actuation force per finger/key. \textbf{(total: 50 min)}
|
actuation force per finger/key. Typing tests (2x 5 min + 5 min break in
|
||||||
|
between tests) \textbf{(total: (i) 60 min / (ii) 45 min)}
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
\item Typing sample text on an analog keyboard with high actuation force (150
|
\item \textbf{Alternative Methods:}
|
||||||
\gls{g}) to measure difference in typing force per finger and key. The subject
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
should be forced to press every relevant key (letters, digits, common special
|
\item \textbf{Personalized keyboard:} Typing sample text on an analog
|
||||||
characters) at least 5 times (can be replaced by a keyboard that is equipped
|
keyboard with high actuation force (150 \gls{g}) (less accurate) or on a
|
||||||
with different zones of keyswitches that use appropriate actuation forces) (30
|
normal keyboard which is placed on top of a force plate (more accurate) to
|
||||||
min including adjustment of keyboard and familiarization)
|
measure difference in typing force per finger and key. The subject should
|
||||||
\item Typing speed tests on the adjusted keyboard (15 min) with follow-up ISO
|
be forced to press every relevant key (letters, digits, common special
|
||||||
keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
characters) at least 5 times (Measurement: 15 min, Keyboard adjustment: 15
|
||||||
|
min)
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{Adjusted keyboard:} Keyboard that is equipped with different
|
||||||
|
zones of keyswitches that use appropriate actuation forces according to
|
||||||
|
finger strength differences and key position. (Keyboard adjustment: 15 min)
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
\item Familiarization with the keyboard (10 min)
|
||||||
|
\item First typing test on the personalized/adjusted keyboard (5 min) \\
|
||||||
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
|
\item Second typing test on the personalized/adjusted keyboard (5 min) \\
|
||||||
|
Follow-up ISO keyboard comfort questionnaire (ISO9241-410) (5 min)
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% More than 60 min is probably to long
|
|
||||||
With all those tasks, the experiment would exceed 60 minutes. Therefore, the
|
|
||||||
additional typing test with the adjusted keyboard could take place on another
|
|
||||||
day or the initial tests to figure out the performance and comfort for different
|
|
||||||
key actuation forces could be left out entirely and only the adjusted keyboard
|
|
||||||
is compared to the personal keyboard of each participant.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All tests could be enhanced with the use of \gls{EMG} measurement and/or additional force measurement (with force plates) during the typing tests.
|
All tests could be enhanced with the use of \gls{EMG} measurement and/or additional force measurement (with force plates) during the typing tests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This test scenario is inspired by the tests conducted by \cite{kim_typingforces}.
|
This test scenario is inspired by the tests conducted by \cite{kim_typingforces}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% TODO: Dissatisfied statt comfort da hohe error rate und dadurch frustriert
|
|
||||||
% TODO: Bei hypothesen noch error rate bei geschwindigkeit mit einbeziehen
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
|
|||||||
\newacronym{EMG}{EMG}{Electromyography}
|
\newacronym{EMG}{EMG}{Electromyography}
|
||||||
\newacronym{CTS}{CTS}{Carpal Tunnel Syndrome}
|
\newacronym{CTS}{CTS}{Carpal Tunnel Syndrome}
|
||||||
\newacronym{RSI}{RSI}{Repetitive Strain Injury}
|
\newacronym{RSI}{RSI}{Repetitive Strain Injury}
|
||||||
|
\newacronym{FRE}{FRE}{Flesch Reading Ease Score}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newglossaryentry{cN}{
|
\newglossaryentry{cN}{
|
||||||
name={cN},
|
name={cN},
|
||||||
@ -16,4 +17,8 @@ description={Gram: 1 g $ \approx $ 0.97 cN}
|
|||||||
\newglossaryentry{gf}{
|
\newglossaryentry{gf}{
|
||||||
name={gf},
|
name={gf},
|
||||||
description={Gram-force: 1 gf = 1 g}
|
description={Gram-force: 1 gf = 1 g}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\newglossaryentry{QWERTZ}{
|
||||||
|
name={QWERTZ},
|
||||||
|
description={Keyboard layout commonly used in Germany}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
BIN
images/gott_contribute_text.png
Normal file
BIN
images/gott_contribute_text.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 92 KiB |
@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
|
|||||||
\usepackage{multirow}
|
\usepackage{multirow}
|
||||||
\usepackage{colortbl}
|
\usepackage{colortbl}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{mathtools}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%----Kopfzeile-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
%----Kopfzeile-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
\usepackage{scrlayer-scrpage} % Aufruf KOMA-Skript für Kopfzeilen
|
\usepackage{scrlayer-scrpage} % Aufruf KOMA-Skript für Kopfzeilen
|
||||||
%----Separator Header/Footer---------------------------------------------------------
|
%----Separator Header/Footer---------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
139
ref_shelf.bib
139
ref_shelf.bib
@ -1,43 +1,49 @@
|
|||||||
% Encoding: UTF-8
|
% Encoding: UTF-8
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@incollection{eurostat_ent_w_comp,
|
@incollection{eurostat_ent_w_comp,
|
||||||
title = "Share of enterprises who used computers in the United Kingdom (UK) and European Union (EU-28 countries) from 2010 to 2015 [Graph]",
|
title = {Share of enterprises who used computers in the United Kingdom
|
||||||
author = "Eurostat",
|
(UK) and European Union (EU-28 countries) from 2010 to 2015
|
||||||
booktitle = "Statista",
|
[Graph]},
|
||||||
url= "https://www-statista-com.thi.idm.oclc.org/statistics/275306/share-of-enterprises-who-used-computers-in-the-uk-and-eu-since-2010/",
|
author = {Eurostat},
|
||||||
year = 2016,
|
booktitle = {Statista},
|
||||||
month = may,
|
url =
|
||||||
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
{https://www-statista-com.thi.idm.oclc.org/statistics/275306/share-of-enterprises-who-used-computers-in-the-uk-and-eu-since-2010/},
|
||||||
|
year = 2016,
|
||||||
|
month = {may},
|
||||||
|
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@incollection{iresearch_ent_w_comp,
|
@incollection{iresearch_ent_w_comp,
|
||||||
title = "Computer usage rate in enterprises in China from 2011 to 2016 [Graph]",
|
title = {Computer usage rate in enterprises in China from 2011 to 2016
|
||||||
author = "iResearch",
|
[Graph]},
|
||||||
booktitle = "Statista",
|
author = {iResearch},
|
||||||
url = "https://www-statista-com.thi.idm.oclc.org/statistics/885270/enterprise-computer-usage-rate-in-china/",
|
booktitle = {Statista},
|
||||||
year = 2018,
|
url =
|
||||||
month = jul,
|
{https://www-statista-com.thi.idm.oclc.org/statistics/885270/enterprise-computer-usage-rate-in-china/},
|
||||||
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
year = 2018,
|
||||||
|
month = {jul},
|
||||||
|
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@incollection{itu_hh_w_comp,
|
@incollection{itu_hh_w_comp,
|
||||||
title = "Share of households with a computer at home worldwide from 2005 to 2019 [Graph]",
|
title = {Share of households with a computer at home worldwide from
|
||||||
author = "ITU",
|
2005 to 2019 [Graph]},
|
||||||
booktitle = "Statista",
|
author = {ITU},
|
||||||
url = "https://www-statista-com.thi.idm.oclc.org/statistics/748551/worldwide-households-with-computer/",
|
booktitle = {Statista},
|
||||||
year = 2019,
|
url =
|
||||||
month = nov,
|
{https://www-statista-com.thi.idm.oclc.org/statistics/748551/worldwide-households-with-computer/},
|
||||||
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
year = 2019,
|
||||||
|
month = {nov},
|
||||||
|
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{bretz_finger_force,
|
@article{bretz_finger_force,
|
||||||
author = {Bretz, Károly and Jobbágy, Ákos and Bretz, Károly},
|
author = {Bretz, Károly and Jobbágy, Ákos and Bretz, Károly},
|
||||||
year = {2010},
|
year = 2010,
|
||||||
month = {04},
|
month = 04,
|
||||||
pages = {},
|
title = {Force measurement of hand and fingers},
|
||||||
title = {Force measurement of hand and fingers},
|
journal = {Biomechanica Hungarica},
|
||||||
journal = {Biomechanica Hungarica},
|
doi = {10.17489/biohun/2010/1/07}
|
||||||
doi = {10.17489/biohun/2010/1/07}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@online{ergopedia_keyswitch,
|
@online{ergopedia_keyswitch,
|
||||||
@ -47,18 +53,21 @@ url = {http://www.ergopedia.ca/ergonomic_concepts/Mechanical_Keyswitches_Membran
|
|||||||
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{kim_typingforces,
|
@article{kim_typingforces,
|
||||||
title = "Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards",
|
title = {Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and
|
||||||
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
|
typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop
|
||||||
volume = "45",
|
keyboards},
|
||||||
number = "6",
|
journal = {Applied Ergonomics},
|
||||||
pages = "1406 - 1413",
|
volume = 45,
|
||||||
year = "2014",
|
number = 6,
|
||||||
issn = "0003-6870",
|
pages = {1406 - 1413},
|
||||||
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.001",
|
year = 2014,
|
||||||
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368701400043X",
|
issn = {0003-6870},
|
||||||
author = "Jeong Ho Kim and Lovenoor Aulck and Michael C. Bartha and Christy A. Harper and Peter W. Johnson"
|
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.001},
|
||||||
|
url =
|
||||||
|
{http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368701400043X},
|
||||||
|
author = {Jeong Ho Kim and Lovenoor Aulck and Michael C. Bartha and
|
||||||
|
Christy A. Harper and Peter W. Johnson}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@online{statist_counterbalancing,
|
@online{statist_counterbalancing,
|
||||||
@ -69,16 +78,44 @@ urldate = {2020-10-12}
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@incollection{handbook_chi,
|
@incollection{handbook_chi,
|
||||||
title = "Chapter 1 - Human-Computer Interaction: Background and Issues",
|
title = {Chapter 1 - Human-Computer Interaction: Background and Issues},
|
||||||
editor = "Marting G. Helander and Thomas K. Landauer and Prasad V. Prabhu",
|
editor = {Marting G. Helander and Thomas K. Landauer and Prasad
|
||||||
booktitle = "Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Second Edition)",
|
V. Prabhu},
|
||||||
publisher = "North-Holland",
|
booktitle = {Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Second Edition)},
|
||||||
edition = "Second Edition",
|
publisher = {North-Holland},
|
||||||
address = "Amsterdam",
|
edition = {Second Edition},
|
||||||
pages = "3 - 31",
|
address = {Amsterdam},
|
||||||
year = "1997",
|
pages = {3 - 31},
|
||||||
isbn = "978-0-444-81862-1",
|
year = 1997,
|
||||||
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50067-4",
|
isbn = {978-0-444-81862-1},
|
||||||
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444818621500674",
|
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50067-4},
|
||||||
author = "Raymond S. Nickerson and Thomas K. Landauer"
|
url =
|
||||||
|
{http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444818621500674},
|
||||||
|
author = {Raymond S. Nickerson and Thomas K. Landauer}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{iso9995-1,
|
||||||
|
title = {Information technology — Keyboard layouts for text and office
|
||||||
|
systems},
|
||||||
|
author = {International Organization for Standardization},
|
||||||
|
journal = {International Organization for Standardization},
|
||||||
|
year = 2018
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@book{amstad_fre,
|
||||||
|
title = {Wie verständlich sind unsere Zeitungen?},
|
||||||
|
author = {Amstad, Toni},
|
||||||
|
year = 1978,
|
||||||
|
publisher = {Studenten-Schreib-Service}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{flesch_fre,
|
||||||
|
title={A new readability yardstick.},
|
||||||
|
author={Flesch, Rudolph},
|
||||||
|
journal={Journal of Applied Psychology},
|
||||||
|
volume={32},
|
||||||
|
number={3},
|
||||||
|
pages={221-233},
|
||||||
|
year={1948},
|
||||||
|
publisher={American Psychological Association}
|
||||||
|
}
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user