You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
51 lines
3.0 KiB
51 lines
3.0 KiB
%----------Zusammenfassung Englisch/Abstract----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
\addsec{Abstract}
|
|
|
|
Keyboards are omnipresent in modern society. Hospitals, retail stores, offices
|
|
or at home, the keyboard is still, the main input device for almost anyone that
|
|
interacts with a computer. However, at some point, many people experience
|
|
discomfort or even pain while using a keyboard because of the many small and
|
|
repetitive movements the fingers have to do to operate it. Therefore, in this
|
|
thesis we try to evaluate an alternative, non-uniform keyboard design, where
|
|
each individual \textit{mechanical} keyswitch is equipped with a spring, that
|
|
features a resistance, appropriate for the specific finger usually operating
|
|
it. The idea behind this adjusted design is to particularly reduce the load on
|
|
weaker fingers and still pertain or even enhance typing
|
|
performance. Additionally, we try to answer the question, whether or not a
|
|
keyboard with, per finger, adjusted actuation force has a positive impact on
|
|
efficiency and overall satisfaction. Thus, we evaluated the current availability
|
|
of resistances for mechanical keyswitches and conducted a preliminary telephone
|
|
interview (n = 17) to assess preferences, use-cases and previous experiences
|
|
with keyboards. Further, we ran another preliminary experiment, where we
|
|
measured the maximum applicable force for each finger in different positions
|
|
related to keyboarding as a basis for our adjusted keyboard design. Lastly,
|
|
during a three week laboratory user study with twenty-four participants, the
|
|
adjusted keyboard design and three traditional keyboards with 35 g, 50 g and 80
|
|
g actuation force where compared to each other in terms of performance and user
|
|
satisfaction. The statistical analysis revealed, that especially error rates are
|
|
positively influenced by higher actuation forces and that keyboards with neither
|
|
to heavy nor to light resistance generally perform the best in terms of typing
|
|
speed. Further, the adjusted keyboard and the 50 g keyboard performed almost
|
|
identically in all tests and therefore we could not derive any significant
|
|
improvements in performance or satisfaction over traditional designs that
|
|
utilize keyswitches with moderate resistance. However, we concluded, that with
|
|
the equally good results, the adjusted design is still a viable alternative and
|
|
with further improvements, e.g., complete personalization of spring resistance
|
|
for each key, could possibly enhance the user experience and performance for
|
|
sophisticated typists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Even though experts recommend to regularly take a break from
|
|
% keyboard work to prevent such symptoms, these recommendations can rarely be
|
|
% implemented in working environments, where productivity and tight schedules are
|
|
% very common. If the pain or discomfort persists, people have to either reduce or
|
|
% a completely stop working with a keyboard, which in some cases might even force
|
|
% them to change their profession. |