From ccb3ae3f5042907b2b827e147d63342b320cd608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phga <toerd@posteo.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 17:16:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] DOONEEE

---
 appendices.tex              | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 chap2/literature_review.tex |  2 +-
 thesis.tex                  |  1 +
 titlepage.tex               |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/appendices.tex b/appendices.tex
index 9bba426..76f54c3 100644
--- a/appendices.tex
+++ b/appendices.tex
@@ -51,3 +51,34 @@
   \centering
   \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/keyboards}
 \end{figure}
+
+\subsection{Folder Structure of the Annexed Storage Media}
+\label{app:usb}
+\dirtree{%
+.1 Thumb drive.
+.2 code.
+.3 gott.
+.3 typing\_force.
+.2 experiments\_and\_studies.
+.3 additional\_scripts.
+.3 finger\_force\_study.
+.3 main\_user\_study.
+.3 market\_research.
+.3 statistical\_analysis.
+.3 telephone\_interview.
+.2 latex\_source.
+.2 presentation.
+.2 thesis\_philip\_gaber.pdf.
+}
+
+\\
+\\
+\textbf{Additional information}
+
+
+\begin{itemize}
+  \item \textbf{gott}: Source code for the typing test platform
+  \item \textbf{typing\_force}: Source code for the finger force apparatus
+  \item \textbf{additional\_scripts}: Scripts used to retrieve and clean up data from \gls{GoTT}
+  \item \textbf{statistical\_analysis}:  R source code and \underline{CSV data files}
+\end{itemize}
diff --git a/chap2/literature_review.tex b/chap2/literature_review.tex
index ef583be..014b5a5 100644
--- a/chap2/literature_review.tex
+++ b/chap2/literature_review.tex
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ terms of user satisfaction, comfort and usability \cite{kim_typingforces,
   iso9241-411}. This survey poses a total of twelve questions concerning e.g.,
 fatigue of specific regions of the upper extremity, general satisfaction with
 the keyboard, perceived precision and uniformity while typing, etc., which are
-presented on a seven-point Likert-scale \cite{iso9241-411}. Further, studies
+presented on a seven-point Likert scale \cite{iso9241-411}. Further, studies
 concerning the usability and user experience of different text entry methods
 used the \gls{UEQ} or \gls{UEQ-S} to evaluate the differences in those
 categories \cite{nguyen_ueq, olshevsky_ueq, gkoumas_ueq}. While the full
diff --git a/thesis.tex b/thesis.tex
index 76cd904..b593646 100644
--- a/thesis.tex
+++ b/thesis.tex
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ openright]{scrartcl}
 \usepackage[font=footnotesize]{caption}
 \usepackage[outputdir=auto]{minted}
 \usepackage[framemethod=tikz]{mdframed}
+\usepackage{dirtree}
 
 \usepackage{pifont}
 \newcommand{\cmark}{\ding{51}}
diff --git a/titlepage.tex b/titlepage.tex
index 929bcf4..f5654b8 100644
--- a/titlepage.tex
+++ b/titlepage.tex
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 		Name and Surname: & \textbf{Philip Gaber}	\\ [3em]
 
 		Issued on:	& 08.04.2021	\\ [1em] % issuing date
-		Submitted on:	& 01.08.2021	\\ [3em] %date of hand in
+		Submitted on:	& 04.08.2021	\\ [3em] %date of hand in
 
 		First examiner: 	& Prof. Priv.-Doz. Dr. techn. Andreas Riener\\ [1em]
 		Second examiner: 	& Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Franz Regensburger\\[3em]