|
|
|
@ -314,19 +314,19 @@ to \textit{Own} (\gls{OPC}). All data can be observed in Figure
|
|
|
|
Y & Comparison & Statistic & p & Estimate & CI & Hypothesis \\
|
|
|
|
Y & Comparison & Statistic & p & Estimate & CI & Hypothesis \\
|
|
|
|
\midrule
|
|
|
|
\midrule
|
|
|
|
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Non Parametric (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test)}} \\
|
|
|
|
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Non Parametric (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test)}} \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Athena - Hera & 38.0 & 0.004^* & -0.011 & [-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Athena - Hera & 38.0 & 0.004^* & -0.011 & ]-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Athena - Aphrodite & 58.5 & 0.009^* & -0.012 & [-Inf, 0] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Athena - Aphrodite & 58.5 & 0.009^* & -0.012 & ]-Inf, 0] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Athena - Nyx & 18.0 & 0.00009^* & -0.027 & [-Inf, -0.02] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Athena - Nyx & 18.0 & 0.00009^* & -0.027 & ]-Inf, -0.02] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Aphrodite - Nyx & 35.5 & 0.002^* & -0.018 & [-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Aphrodite - Nyx & 35.5 & 0.002^* & -0.018 & ]-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Hera - Aphrodite & 181.0 & 0.816 & 0.002 & [-Inf, 0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Hera - Aphrodite & 181.0 & 0.816 & 0.002 & ]-Inf, 0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Hera - Nyx & 29.5 & 0.002^* & -0.016 & [-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
TER & Hera - Nyx & 29.5 & 0.002^* & -0.016 & ]-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Parametric (Dependent T-test)}} \\
|
|
|
|
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Parametric (Dependent T-test)}} \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Athena - Hera & -2.796 & 0.015^* & -0.011 & [-Inf, 0] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Athena - Hera & -2.796 & 0.015^* & -0.011 & ]-Inf, 0] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Athena - Aphrodite & -2.772 & 0.015^* & -0.011 & [-Inf, 0] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Athena - Aphrodite & -2.772 & 0.015^* & -0.011 & ]-Inf, 0] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Athena - Nyx & -4.356 & 0.0007^* & -0.030 & [-Inf, -0.02] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Athena - Nyx & -4.356 & 0.0007^* & -0.030 & ]-Inf, -0.02] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Aphrodite - Nyx & -3.821 & 0.002^* & -0.019 & [-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Aphrodite - Nyx & -3.821 & 0.002^* & -0.019 & ]-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Hera - Aphrodite & 0.050 & 0.520 & 0.000 & [-Inf, 0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Hera - Aphrodite & 0.050 & 0.520 & 0.000 & ]-Inf, 0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Hera - Nyx & -3.825 & 0.002^* & -0.019 & [-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
CER & Hera - Nyx & -3.825 & 0.002^* & -0.019 & ]-Inf, -0.01] & less \\
|
|
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
|
|
\caption{Post-hoc results of error rates for the test keyboards. Significant p
|
|
|
|
\caption{Post-hoc results of error rates for the test keyboards. Significant p
|
|
|
|
@ -364,9 +364,9 @@ statistically significant differences in \%\gls{MVC} between the first and the
|
|
|
|
second typing test for any keyboard/muscle combination. The summaries for all
|
|
|
|
second typing test for any keyboard/muscle combination. The summaries for all
|
|
|
|
test keyboards of the mean values for both typing tests combined can be observed
|
|
|
|
test keyboards of the mean values for both typing tests combined can be observed
|
|
|
|
in Table \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_emg}. Lastly, we created histograms (Figure
|
|
|
|
in Table \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_emg}. Lastly, we created histograms (Figure
|
|
|
|
\ref{fig:max_mvc_tkbs}) for each of the observed muscle groups, that show the
|
|
|
|
\ref{fig:max_emg_tkbs}) for each of the observed muscle groups, that show the
|
|
|
|
number of times a keyboard yielded the highest \%\gls{MVC} out of all keyboards
|
|
|
|
number of times a keyboard yielded the highest \%\gls{MVC} out of all keyboards
|
|
|
|
for each participant. We found, that \textit{Athena} most frequently (~45\%)
|
|
|
|
for each participant. We found, that \textit{Athena} most frequently ($\approx$45\%)
|
|
|
|
produced the highest extensor muscle activity for both arms. The highest muscle
|
|
|
|
produced the highest extensor muscle activity for both arms. The highest muscle
|
|
|
|
activity for both flexor muscle groups was evenly distributed among all test
|
|
|
|
activity for both flexor muscle groups was evenly distributed among all test
|
|
|
|
keyboards with a slight exception of \textit{Nyx}, which produced the highest
|
|
|
|
keyboards with a slight exception of \textit{Nyx}, which produced the highest
|
|
|
|
@ -582,12 +582,12 @@ observed in Tables \ref{tbl:res_tkbs_sati} and \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_sati}.
|
|
|
|
Y & Comparison & Statistic & p & Estimate & CI & Hypothesis \\
|
|
|
|
Y & Comparison & Statistic & p & Estimate & CI & Hypothesis \\
|
|
|
|
\midrule
|
|
|
|
\midrule
|
|
|
|
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Non Parametric (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test)}} \\
|
|
|
|
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Non Parametric (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test)}} \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Aphrodite - Nyx & 217.0 & 0.046^* & 14.0 & [5, Inf] & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Aphrodite - Nyx & 217.0 & 0.046^* & 14.0 & [5, Inf[ & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Aphrodite - Athena & 201.5 & 0.046^* & 12.5 & [4.5, Inf] & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Aphrodite - Athena & 201.5 & 0.046^* & 12.5 & [4.5, Inf[ & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Nyx - Athena & 125.5 & 1.0 & -3.0 & [-11.5, Inf] & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Nyx - Athena & 125.5 & 1.0 & -3.0 & [-11.5, Inf[ & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Hera - Athena & 205.5 & 0.174 & 8.5 & [0, Inf] & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Hera - Athena & 205.5 & 0.174 & 8.5 & [0, Inf[ & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Hera - Aphrodite & 118.5 & 1.0 & -2.5 & [-12.5, Inf] & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Hera - Aphrodite & 118.5 & 1.0 & -2.5 & [-12.5, Inf[ & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Hera - Nyx & 223.5 & 0.074^\dagger & 12.5 & [2.5, Inf] & greater \\
|
|
|
|
SATI & Hera - Nyx & 223.5 & 0.074^\dagger & 12.5 & [2.5, Inf[ & greater \\
|
|
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
|
|
\caption{Post-hoc tests for the additional question \textit{``How satisfied
|
|
|
|
\caption{Post-hoc tests for the additional question \textit{``How satisfied
|
|
|
|
|
phga
4 years ago