phga/bachelor-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update: results done

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
phga 2021-07-23 03:58:54 +02:00
parent 41d3561e1e
commit 6790db1520
20 changed files with 396 additions and 143 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

33
chap2/literature_review.tex
View File

@ -22,11 +22,12 @@ to fulfill required tasks, which in the worst case could require a change of
profession \cite{ccfohas_wrued}. Potential problems with current keyboard
designs and possible solutions are discussed in the following sections.
\subsubsection{Relevance for this Thesis}
\gls{WRUED} are a serious problem of modern society and since there is evidence
pointing towards computer related work to be a possible factor for these
diseases, it is likely that especially keyboards, as the main input device, are
responsible for a portion of people affected by \gls{WRUED}.
\begin{phga_sum*}
\gls{WRUED} are a serious problem of modern society and since there is evidence
pointing towards computer related work to be a possible factor for these
diseases, it is likely that especially keyboards, as the main input device, are
responsible for a portion of people affected by \gls{WRUED}.
\end{phga_sum*}
\subsection{Keyboards and Keyswitches}
\label{sec:kb_ks}
@ -192,8 +193,7 @@ applied by the typist \cite{akagi_keyswitch, gerard_keyswitch,
typing speed, which could be more significant with greater variation of
actuation force across tested keyboards \cite{loricchio_force_speed}.
\subsubsection{Relevance for this Thesis}
\begin{phga_sum*}
Since this thesis is focused around keyboards and especially the relation
between the actuation force of the keyswitch and efficiency (speed, error rate)
and also the differences in satisfaction while using keyswitches with varying
@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ previous research we settled on using a keyboard model with hot-swapping
capabilities for our experiment to reduce the effort required to equip each
keyboard with the required keyswitches and in case a keyswitch fails during
the experiment, decrease the time required to replace the faulty switch.
\end{phga_sum*}
\subsection{Measurement of Typing Related Metrics}
\label{sec:metrics}
@ -257,6 +258,7 @@ According to Flesch, the values retrieved by applying the formula to text can be
classified according to the ranges given in Table \ref{tbl:fre_ranges} \cite{flesch_fre}.
\begin{table}
\centering
\small
\ra{1.3}
\begin{tabular}{?l^c}
\toprule
@ -386,7 +388,7 @@ and hedonic quality). Because of the limited explanatory power of the
complete the full \gls{UEQ} or if the participants of a study are required to
rate several products in one session \cite{schrepp_ueq_handbook}.
\subsubsection{Relevance for this Thesis}
\begin{phga_sum*}
Measuring metrics related to data entry tasks can be performed with the help
several commercially available tools and equipment. Especially muscle activity
has to be measured with appropriate tools and accurate placement of the
@ -398,7 +400,7 @@ any experimental setup concerning the transcription of text
questionnaires can help to gather subjective feedback about the keyboards and
thereby reveal differences that cannot be easily acquired by a device or formula
\cite{rowley_surveys}.
\end{phga_sum*}
\subsection{Observer Bias and a Possible Solution}
\label{sec:bias}
@ -429,8 +431,7 @@ every participant equally by following a predefined procedure and minimize
unnecessary interaction where possible to further minimize the risk of bias
\parencite[674]{angrosino_observer}.
\subsubsection{Relevance for this Thesis}
\begin{phga_sum*}
Summarizing, even seemingly arbitrary decisions or actions can have a potential
undesirable impact on the results of a study. If it is possible to implement
automated checks for the suitability of text e.g., a platform that verifies
@ -439,8 +440,9 @@ completely exclude the researcher from the text selection process and therefore
mitigate the risk of unwanted bias. In addition, the aspect of time in the
preparation phase of a study could be another factor to consider crowdsourcing
to acquire larger amounts of text with equal difficulty.
\end{phga_sum*}
\subsection{Influence of Actuation Force on Keyboard use}
\subsection{Influence of Actuation Force on Keyboard Use}
\label{sec:finger_force}
Section \ref{sec:kb_ks} discussed the differences of various keyswitch
models. One difference was the applied force, a keyswitch required to
@ -474,7 +476,7 @@ design reduced the number of required corrections by 46\% and overall lowered
typos by 87\% compared to when the force feedback was turned off (n=12)
\cite{hoffmann_typeright}.
\subsubsection{Relevance for this Thesis}
\begin{phga_sum*}
So far, studies concerning keyboards with uniform actuation force yielded
different results pertaining speed, but agreed that actuation force influences
the error rate during typing related tasks. To our best knowledge, there are no
@ -484,7 +486,7 @@ want to reevaluate the influence of actuation force on speed and determine, if
keyboards with non-uniform actuation forces have a positive impact on all
metrics mentioned so far. The next section gives insights, into why such
keyboards could make sense.
\end{phga_sum*}
\subsection{Strength of Individual Fingers}
As already mentioned in Section \ref{sec:mech_switch}, the force applied to a
@ -504,7 +506,7 @@ individual digits while typing on a keyboard (n=10). The measured differences
ranged from 0.10 \gls{N} to 1.49 \gls{N} for peak force and 0.01 \gls{N} to 0.08
\gls{N} for mean force \cite{martin_force}.
\subsubsection{Relevance for this Thesis}
\begin{phga_sum*}
The goal of this thesis is to evaluate the possible advantages of keyboards with
non-uniform actuation forces. The fairly small difference of only 0.08 \gls{N} in mean
force applied to keyboards recorded by Martin et al. \cite{martin_force} but
@ -512,6 +514,7 @@ rather big difference in finger strength measured by Bretz et
al. \cite{bretz_finger} could indicate, that albeit the difference in strength,
all fingers have to apply equal force to generate a keypress because of the
uniform actuation force used in commercially available keyboards.
\end{phga_sum*}
\subsection{Summary}
\label{sec:lr_sum}

5
chap3/implementation.tex
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
\section{Implementation}
\section{Development and Implementation of Necessary Tools}
For the purpose of this thesis, we programmed our own typing test platform to
have better control over the performance related measurements and the text that
has to be transcribed. Further, the participants had to fill out up to two
@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ The platform offers three major functionalities that are important for this thes
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{images/gott_text_area.jpg}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/gott_text_area.jpg}
\caption{\gls{GoTT}'s typing test. The \textit{START} button reveals the
text selected with the dropdown menu labeled \textit{Text to
transcribe}. The \textit{RESET} button interrupts the currently active
@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ func calculateFRE(txt string) float64 {
\end{listing}
\end{enumerate}
\pagebreak
\subsection{Finger Strength Measurement Device}
\label{sec:force_meas_dev}

2
chap4/methodology.tex
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
\section{Methodology}
\section{Methodology and Structure of the Research Process}
\label{sec:methodology}
\subsection{Research Approach}
Because of the controversial findings about the impact of key actuation forces

236
chap5/results.tex
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
% A rapid method that creates many corrected errors, has efficient error correction, and leaves
% few uncorrected errors can still be considered a successful method, since it produces
% accurate text in relatively little time. pp. 56 MacKenzie
\section{Results}
\section{Results of the Main User Study}
\label{sec:results}
This section addresses the statistical analysis of the data obtained throughout
the main, within-subject, user study (n = 24) that consisted of five repeated
@ -141,7 +141,17 @@ significant differences between \textit{Aphrodite} (M = 51.5, sd = 14.0) and
3.53, p = 0.01). Further, the \gls{rmANOVA} for \gls{AdjWPM} yielded (F(3, 69) =
6.197, p = 0.0009) and for \gls{KSPS} (F(3, 69) = 3.566, p = 0.018). All
relevant results of the post-hoc tests and the summary of the performance data
can be observed in Tables \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_speed} and \ref{tbl:res_tkbs_speed}.
can be observed in Tables \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_speed} and
\ref{tbl:res_tkbs_speed}. We further examined, which of the four test keyboard
was the fastest for each participant and found, that \textit{Hera} was the
fastest keyboard in terms of \gls{WPM} for 46\% (11) of the twenty-four
subjects. Additionally, we analyzed the \gls{WPM} percentage of \textit{Own}
(\gls{OPC}) for all test keyboards to figure out, which keyboard exceeded the
performance of the participant's own keyboard. We found, that three subjects
reached \gls{OPC}\_\gls{WPM} values greater than 100\% with all four test
keyboards. Also, \textit{Athena, Aphrodite} and \textit{Hera} exceeded 100\% of
\gls{OPC}\_\gls{WPM} eight, seven and six times respectively. Detailed results
are presented in Figure \ref{fig:max_opc_wpm}.
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
@ -215,6 +225,15 @@ can be observed in Tables \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_speed} and \ref{tbl:res_tkbs_speed}.
\label{tbl:res_tkbs_speed}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/max_opc_wpm}
\caption{The left graph shows the fastest keyboard in terms of \gls{WPM} for
each participant. The right graph shows, which keyboards were even faster
than the participant's own keyboard (\gls{OPC}\_\gls{WPM} > 100\%)}
\label{fig:max_opc_wpm}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Error Rate}
\label{sec:res_error_rate}
\gls{GoTT} also automatically tracked various error related metrics from which
@ -230,7 +249,15 @@ Test for \gls{UER} ($\chi^2$(3) = 2.59, p = 0.46) yielded no statistical
significant difference. It should be noted, that the 90th percentile of
\gls{UER} for all keyboards was still below 1\%. Summaries for the individual
metrics and results for all post-hoc tests can be seen in Table
\ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_err} and \ref{tbl:res_tkbs_err}.
\ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_err} and \ref{tbl:res_tkbs_err}. Furthermore, we compared the
\gls{TER} of all test keyboards for each participant and found, that
\textit{Athena} was the keyboard which participants typed most accurately
with. Two participants scored identical \gls{TER} with two test keyboards,
therefore the total number of ``1st-placed'' keyboards increased to twenty-six.
Lastly, we compared the test keyboards to subject's own keyboards and examined
that eleven participants scored lower \gls{TER}s with \textit{Athena} compared
to \textit{Own} (\gls{OPC}). All data can be observed in Figure
\ref{fig:max_opc_ter}.
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
@ -309,7 +336,16 @@ metrics and results for all post-hoc tests can be seen in Table
\label{tbl:res_tkbs_err}
\end{table}
\subsection{Muscle Activity}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/max_opc_ter}
\caption{The left graph shows the keyboard with the lowest \gls{TER} for each
participant. The right graph shows, which keyboards were more accurate than
the participant's own keyboard (\gls{OPC}\_\gls{TER} < 100\%)}
\label{fig:max_opc_ter}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Muscle Activity Measurements}
\label{sec:res_muscle_activity}
We utilized the \gls{EMG} device described in Section \ref{sec:main_design} to
gather data about the muscle activities (\% of \glsfirst{MVC}) during typing
@ -327,7 +363,23 @@ using either dependent T-tests or Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. There were no
statistically significant differences in \%\gls{MVC} between the first and the
second typing test for any keyboard/muscle combination. The summaries for all
test keyboards of the mean values for both typing tests combined can be observed
in Table \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_emg}.
in Table \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_emg}. Lastly, we created histograms (Figure
\ref{fig:max_mvc_tkbs}) for each of the observed muscle groups, that show the
number of times a keyboard yielded the highest \%\gls{MVC} out of all keyboards
for each participant. We found, that \textit{Athena} most frequently (~45\%)
produced the highest extensor muscle activity for both arms. The highest muscle
activity for both flexor muscle groups was evenly distributed among all test
keyboards with a slight exception of \textit{Nyx}, which produced the highest
\%\gls{MVC} only in ~14\% of participants.
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/max_emg_tkbs}
\caption{Histograms for all \gls{EMG} measurements that show the keyboard with
the highest mean \% of \glsfirst{MVC} out of all four keyboards for each
participant}
\label{fig:max_emg_tkbs}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
@ -402,14 +454,14 @@ previously used keyboard which are labelled as follows:
\centering
\ra{0.8}
\small
\begin{tabular}{llll}
\begin{tabular}{llll}
\textbf{KCQ1:} & \textit{``Required operating force during usage?''} & \textbf{KCQ7:} & \textit{``Ease of use?''} \\
\textbf{KCQ2:} & \textit{``Perceived uniformity during usage?''} & \textbf{KCQ8:} & \textit{``Fatigue of the fingers?''} \\
\textbf{KCQ3:} & \textit{``Effort required during usage?''} & \textbf{KCQ9:} & \textit{``Fatigue of the wrists?''} \\
\textbf{KCQ4:} & \textit{``Perceived accuracy?''} & \textbf{KCQ10:} & \textit{``Fatigue of the arms?''} \\
\textbf{KCQ5:} & \textit{``Acceptability of speed?''} & \textbf{KCQ11:} & \textit{``Fatigue of the shoulders?''} \\
\textbf{KCQ6:} & \textit{``Overall satisfaction?''} & \textbf{KCQ12:} & \textit{``Fatigue of the neck?''} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
All questions featured a 7-point Likert scale where 1 always denoted the worst
@ -461,3 +513,173 @@ Table \ref{tbl:res_kcq}.
\end{table}
\subsubsection{User Experience Questionnaire (Short)}
\label{sec:res_ueqs}
Additionally to the \gls{KCQ} we utilized the \glsfirst{UEQ-S}. It featured
eight questions on a 7-point Likert scale, which formed two scales (pragmatic,
hedonic). Additionally we added one extra question that could be answered on a
\glsfirst{VAS} from 0 to 100. The survey was filled out after both tests with a
keyboard have been completed. The questions of our modified \gls{UEQ-S} were
labelled as follows:
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\ra{0.8}
\small
\begin{tabular}{llll}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Pragmatic Scale} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hedonic Scale} \\
\\
\textbf{PRA1:} & \textit{``Obstructive or Supportive?''} & \textbf{HED1:} & \textit{``Boring or Exciting?''} \\
\textbf{PRA2:} & \textit{``Complicated or Easy?''} & \textbf{HED2:} & \textit{``Not interesting or Interesting?''} \\
\textbf{PRA3:} & \textit{``Inefficient or Efficient?''} & \textbf{HED3:} & \textit{``Conventional or Inventive?''} \\
\textbf{PRA4:} & \textit{``Confusing or Clear?''} & \textbf{HED4:} & \textit{``Usual or Leading Edge?''} \\
\\
\multicolumn{4}{c}{Additional Question (\gls{VAS})} \\
\\
\textbf{SATI:} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{\textit{``How satisfied have you been with this keyboard?''}}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
The 7-point Likert scale items (PRA1-4, HED1-4) were then transformed to
represent a scale from -3 to +3, where -3 represented the left term and +3 the
right term of the ``or'' questions. All sub-scales, pragmatic ($\alpha$ =
0.90)\footnote{PRA: Athena ($\alpha$ = 0.83), Aphrodite ($\alpha$ = 0.95), Nyx
($\alpha$ = 0.90), Hera ($\alpha$ = 0.85)} and hedonic ($\alpha$ =
0.88)\footnote{HED: Athena ($\alpha$ = 0.89), Aphrodite ($\alpha$ = 0.89), Nyx
($\alpha$ = 0.91), Hera ($\alpha$ = 0.90)}, exceeded the recommended threshold
for Cronbach's alpha of $\alpha$ > 0.7 \cite{schrepp_ueq_handbook}. The mean
values for all responses of the \gls{UEQ-S} can be seen in Figure
\ref{fig:kcq_tkbs_res} and the individual responses to the additional question
(SATI) are presented in Figure \ref{fig:sati_tkbs_res}. We conducted
\gls{rmANOVA}s for both sub-scales but found no statistically significant
variations for the pragmatic scale (F(3, 69) = 3.254, p = 0.06, post-hoc did not
reveal any tendencies) nor the hedonic scale (F(3, 69) = 0.425, p =
0.74). Contrary, the \gls{rmANOVA} for the additional question \textit{SATI}
indicated statistically significant differences (F(3, 69) = 3.254, p =
0.027). In this case, we decided to use Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests for our
post-hoc analysis because of our interest in the difference of medians and the
relatively high power of this test in analyzing \gls{VAS} data
\cite{heller_vas}. The results and summaries for the test keyboards can be
observed in Tables \ref{tbl:res_tkbs_sati} and \ref{tbl:sum_tkbs_sati}.
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/ueq_tkbs_res}
\caption{Means of the responses for all questions of the \glsfirst{UEQ-S}}
\label{fig:ueq_tkbs_res}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\small
\ra{1.3}
\begin{tabular}{?l^l^l^l^l^l^l^l}
\toprule
\rowstyle{\itshape}
Y & Comparison & Statistic & p & Estimate & CI & Hypothesis \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{6}{l}{\textbf{Non Parametric (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test)}} \\
SATI & Aphrodite - Nyx & 217.0 & 0.046^* & 14.0 & [5, Inf] & greater \\
SATI & Aphrodite - Athena & 201.5 & 0.046^* & 12.5 & [4.5, Inf] & greater \\
SATI & Nyx - Athena & 125.5 & 1.0 & -3.0 & [-11.5, Inf] & greater \\
SATI & Hera - Athena & 205.5 & 0.174 & 8.5 & [0, Inf] & greater \\
SATI & Hera - Aphrodite & 118.5 & 1.0 & -2.5 & [-12.5, Inf] & greater \\
SATI & Hera - Nyx & 223.5 & 0.074^\dagger & 12.5 & [2.5, Inf] & greater \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Post-hoc tests for the additional question \textit{``How satisfied
have you been with this keyboard?''}. Statistically significant
differences (p < 0.05) are marked with an * and p values indicating a trend
towards significance are denoted with $\dagger$. Confidence intervals are
given for the difference of the location parameter. We only tested keyboards
with lower actuation force against keyboards with higher actuation
force. The first comparison of Aphrodite (50 g) and Nyx (35 g) was added,
because of the noticeable differences in the visual assessment of Figure
\ref{fig:sati_tkbs_res}}
\label{tbl:res_tkbs_sati}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\small
\ra{1.3}
\begin{tabular}{?r^l^l^l^l^l^l^l}
\toprule
\rowstyle{\itshape}
Pseud. & Mean & Median & Min & Max & SD & SE \\
\midrule
Athena & 54.12 & 50.00 & 1.00 & 95.00 & 25.43 & 5.19 \\
Aphrodite & 65.08 & 71.50 & 10.00 & 94.00 & 22.56 & 4.61 \\
Nyx & 51.42 & 55.00 & 0.00 & 90.00 & 23.40 & 4.78 \\
Hera & 63.29 & 70.00 & 12.00 & 92.00 & 19.95 & 4.07 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Summaries for the additional question \textit{``How satisfied have
you been with this keyboard?''} for all four test keyboards}
\label{tbl:sum_tkbs_sati}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/sati_tkbs_res}
\caption{Responses for the additional question \textit{``How satisfied have
you been with this keyboard?''} with the means for all participant
represented as horizontal lines}
\label{fig:sati_tkbs_res}
\end{figure}
\subsection{UX Curves and Semi-Structured Interviews}
\label{sec:res_uxc}
In order to give all participants the chance to recapitulate the whole
experiment and give retrospective feedback about each individual keyboard, we
conducted a semi-structured interview which included drawing UX-curves for
perceived fatigue and perceived typing speed. We evaluated the curves by
measuring the y position of the \gls{SP} for a curve and the y position of the
respective \gls{EP} an determine the slope of that curve. Slopes are defined as
improving if \gls{SP} < \gls{EP}, deteriorating if \gls{SP} > \gls{EP} and
stable if \gls{SP} = \gls{EP} (margin of $\pm$ 1 mm). One curve can either
represent one typing test (C1 or C2) or the whole experience with one keyboard
over the course of both typing tests (C12). All curves can be observed in
Appendix \ref{app:uxc} and the resulting slopes for all curve types are shown in
Figure \ref{fig:res_uxc}. During the semi-structured interview, we asked the
participants to rank the keyboards from 1 (favorite) to 5 (least favorite). If
in doubt, participants were allowed to place two keyboards on the same
rank. Further, we asked some participants (n = 19) to also rank the keyboards
from lowest actuation force (one) to highest actuation force (five). The
participants own keyboard was four times more often placed first than any other
keyboard. \textit{Hera} was the only keyboard, that never got placed fifth and
except for \textit{Own}, was the most represented keyboard in the top three. The
ranking of the perceived actuation force revealed, that participants were able
to identify \textit{Nyx} (35 g) and \textit{Athena} (80 g) as the keyboards with
the lowest and highest actuation force respectively. All results for both
rankings are visualized in Figure \ref{fig:res_interview}. Lastly, we analyzed
the recordings of all interviews and found several similar statements about
specific keyboards. Twelve participants noted, that because of the new form
factor of the test keyboards, additional familiarization was required to feel
comfortable. Nine of those specifically mentioned the height of the keyboard as
the main difference. Fourteen subjects reported―\textit{``Because Nyx had such a
low resistance, I kept making mistakes!''}. Four participants explicitly
noted, that \textit{Hera} felt very pleasant and two subjects mentioned
\textit{``I had really good flow.''} and \textit{``It somehow just felt
right''}. Ten participants reported, that typing on \textit{Athena} was
exhausting. \textit{Aphrodite} was not mentioned as often as the other keyboards
which could be related to a comment of two subjects―\textit{``It felt very
similar to my own Keyboard''}.
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/res_uxc}
\caption{\centering Evaluation of UX-curve slopes for perceived fatigue and perceived
speed. \\
\textit{DE:} deteriorating, \textit{IM:} improving, \textit{ST:} stable}
\label{fig:res_uxc}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{images/res_interview}
\caption{Rankings for favorite keyboard and perceived required actuation force
for all keyboards including \textit{Own}. The graphs show the number of
times a keyboard was placed at a certain rank}
\label{fig:res_interview}
\end{figure}

6
chap7/conclusion.tex
View File

@ -1,2 +1,8 @@
\section{Conclusion}
\label{sec:label}
\subsection{Future work}
\label{sec:label}
\subsection{Limitations}
\label{sec:label}

2
chap7/future_work.tex
View File

@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
\section{Future work}
\label{sec:label}

2
chap7/limitations.tex
View File

@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
\section{Limitations}
\label{sec:label}

3
glossary.tex
View File

@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
\newacronym{GG}{GG}{Greenhouse–Geisser corrected}
\newacronym{Q-Q}{Q-Q}{quantile-quantile}
\newacronym{OPC}{OPC}{percentage of keyboard ``Own''}
\newacronym{SP}{SP}{starting point}
\newacronym{EP}{EP}{end point}

BIN
images/max_acc_tkbs_sub.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 11 KiB

BIN
images/max_emg_tkbs.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 44 KiB

BIN
images/max_opc_ter.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 49 KiB

BIN
images/max_opc_wpm.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 43 KiB

BIN
images/max_wpm_tkbs_per_sub.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 10 KiB

BIN
images/res_interview.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 41 KiB

BIN
images/res_uxc.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 33 KiB

BIN
images/sati_tkbs_res.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 76 KiB

BIN
images/ueq_tkbs_res.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 46 KiB

3
mainpart.tex
View File

@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
\input{chap5/results}
\newpage
%\thispagestyle{myPageStyle}
\input{chap6/discussion}
\input{chap6/recommendations} % 8. Discussion, Deriving concrete action recommendations
@ -32,6 +31,4 @@
%\thispagestyle{myPageStyle}
\input{chap7/conclusion}
\input{chap7/future_work}
\input{chap7/limitations}
\newpage

12
ref_shelf.bib
View File

@ -911,3 +911,15 @@ urldate = {2021-07-06}
year={2011},
publisher={IJME}
}
@article{heller_vas,
author = {Gillian Z. Heller and Maurizio Manuguerra and Roberta Chow},
doi = {doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012},
title = {How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance},
journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Pain},
number = {1},
volume = {13},
year = {2016},
pages = {67--75}
}

211
thesis.tex
View File

@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----Präambel/Preamble---------------------------------------------------------------
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----Präambel/Preamble---------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\documentclass[a4paper,
11pt,
DIV=11,
headings=big,
index=totoc,
listof=totoc,
bibliography=totoc,
parskip=half,
cleardoublepage=empty,
oneside,
openright]{scrartcl}
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11pt,
DIV=11,
headings=big,
index=totoc,
listof=totoc,
bibliography=totoc,
parskip=half,
cleardoublepage=empty,
oneside,
openright]{scrartcl}
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\usepackage[UKenglish]{babel}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
@ -21,9 +21,10 @@
\usepackage{kpfonts}
\usepackage[font=footnotesize]{caption}
\usepackage[outputdir=auto]{minted}
\usepackage{mdframed}
\usepackage[framemethod=tikz]{mdframed}
\BeforeBeginEnvironment{minted}{\begin{mdframed}}
\AfterEndEnvironment{minted}{\end{mdframed}}
\AfterEndEnvironment{minted}{\end{mdframed}}
\usepackage{booktabs}
% \usepackage{tabularx}
\newcommand{\ra}[1]{\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{#1}}
@ -50,10 +51,10 @@
% Hyperref loads url internally therefore we pass the option hyphens to url without loading it manually
\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
\usepackage[pdfborder={0 0 0},
colorlinks=true,
linkcolor=black,
citecolor=red,
]{hyperref}
colorlinks=true,
linkcolor=black,
citecolor=red,
]{hyperref}
% Citation
\usepackage[style=numeric, natbib=true]{biblatex}
@ -71,9 +72,9 @@
\usepackage{mathtools}
%----Kopfzeile-----------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----Kopfzeile-----------------------------------------------------------------------
\usepackage{scrlayer-scrpage} % Aufruf KOMA-Skript für Kopfzeilen
%----Separator Header/Footer---------------------------------------------------------
% ----Separator Header/Footer---------------------------------------------------------
\KOMAoptions{headsepline=true, footsepline=true}
\pagestyle{scrheadings} % Definition der Eigenen Headerformatierung
@ -81,135 +82,147 @@
% \automark[chapter]{section} % Kapitel und Section als Inhalt der Variablen leftmark und rightmark
\ohead{\pagemark} % Seitenzahl auf äußerem Rand
% \ihead{\Ifthispageodd{\leftmark}{\rightmark}} % Innere Überschrift mit Kapitel bei linker Seite und Section bei rechter Seite -> geht nur in Verbindung mit
% zweiseitigem Text wirklich sinnvoll
% zweiseitigem Text wirklich sinnvoll
\setkomafont{pagehead}{\scshape} % Schriftart in Kopfzeile, \scshape = Kapitelchen
%----Fußzeile------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----Fußzeile------------------------------------------------------------------------
\setkomafont{pagefoot}{\scshape} % Schriftart in Fußfzeile, \scshape = Kapitelchen
\ifoot{\footnotesize{Philip Gaber}}
\ofoot{\footnotesize{Bachelor Thesis}}
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----Farbdefinition--THI-Blau--------------------------------------------------------
% ----Farbdefinition--THI-Blau--------------------------------------------------------
\definecolor{thi_blue}{RGB}{2,91,156}
\addtokomafont{section}{\color{thi_blue} \rmfamily \scshape}
\addtokomafont{subsection}{\color{thi_blue} \rmfamily}
\addtokomafont{subsubsection}{\color{thi_blue} \rmfamily}
\addtokomafont{paragraph}{\color{thi_blue} \rmfamily}
\addtokomafont{subparagraph}{\rmfamily}
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\definecolor{tab_2}{RGB}{230,230,230}
\definecolor{tab_1}{RGB}{85,128,214}
%------Längenanpassung---------------------------------------------------------------
% ------Längenanpassung---------------------------------------------------------------
\setlength{\headsep}{10mm} % Textabstand zur Kopfzeile
\setlength{\footskip}{15mm} % Abstand zur Fußzeile
\setlength{\textheight}{235mm} % Texthöhe
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\renewcommand{\thetheorem}{\relax}
\mdfdefinestyle{phga_sum}{
skipabove = 20pt,
skipbelow = 20pt,
linecolor=thi_blue,
frametitlebackgroundcolor=thi_blue!8,
linewidth=1.9pt,
leftline=false,
rightline=false,
bottomline=false,
}
\mdtheorem[style=phga_sum]{phga_sum}{Relevance for this Thesis}
%----Glossar-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----Glossar-------------------------------------------------------------------------
\usepackage[toc,acronym,nonumberlist,nogroupskip]{glossaries}
\makeglossaries
\include{glossary}
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% \includeonly{
% glossary,
% mainpart,
% %fazit,
% % fazit,
% appendices
% }
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----------------DOKUMENT-BEGINN-----------------------------------------------------
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----------------DOKUMENT-BEGINN-----------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\begin{document}
%----Vermeidung von Hurenkindern und Schusterjungen---------------------
\widowpenalty=10000
\clubpenalty=10000
\displaywidowpenalty=10000
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----Vermeidung von Hurenkindern und Schusterjungen---------------------
\widowpenalty=10000
\clubpenalty=10000
\displaywidowpenalty=10000
% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
%Titelseite/title page
\include{titlepage} % include erzeugt immer eine neue Seite bei jedem Einbinden
\cleardoublepage % include always creates a new page
% Titelseite/title page
\include{titlepage} % include erzeugt immer eine neue Seite bei jedem Einbinden
\cleardoublepage % include always creates a new page
\pagenumbering{Roman} % Römische Nummerierung der Kapitel/roman page numbering
\pagenumbering{Roman} % Römische Nummerierung der Kapitel/roman page numbering
%Erklärung
\include{affidavit}
\cleardoublepage
% Erklärung
\include{affidavit}
\cleardoublepage
%Danksagung
\include{acknowledgments}
\cleardoublepage
% Danksagung
\include{acknowledgments}
\cleardoublepage
%Kurfassung/Abstract German (only for thesis written in German)
\include{abstractDE}
\cleardoublepage
% Kurfassung/Abstract German (only for thesis written in German)
\include{abstractDE}
\cleardoublepage
%Kurzfassung/Abstract Englisch (for every thesis)
\include{abstractEN}
\cleardoublepage
% Kurzfassung/Abstract Englisch (for every thesis)
\include{abstractEN}
\cleardoublepage
%Sperrvermerk/Confidentiality clause (if any)
% \include{confidentialityClause}
% \cleardoublepage
% Sperrvermerk/Confidentiality clause (if any)
% \include{confidentialityClause}
% \cleardoublepage
% Inhaltsverzeichnis
\renewcommand{\contentsname}{Table of contents} % Remove for German thesis
\tableofcontents
\cleardoublepage
\singlespacing
% Inhaltsverzeichnis
\renewcommand{\contentsname}{Table of contents} % Remove for German thesis
\tableofcontents
\cleardoublepage
\singlespacing
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%------Ausarbeitung--------------------------------------------------------------
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------Ausarbeitung--------------------------------------------------------------
% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Arabische Nummerierung der Kapitel/Arabic page numbering
\pagenumbering{arabic}
\include{mainpart}
\pagenumbering{arabic}
\include{mainpart}
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%-----Anhang---------------------------------------------------------------------
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% -----Anhang---------------------------------------------------------------------
% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\pagenumbering{Roman} % Römische Nummerierung der Kapitel/Roman page numbering
\setcounter{page}{1} % Beginn bei Seitenzahl X (hier: 6) um bei oberer Nummerierung aufzuschließen/Adapt page numbering
\pagenumbering{Roman} % Römische Nummerierung der Kapitel/Roman page numbering
\setcounter{page}{1} % Beginn bei Seitenzahl X (hier: 6) um bei oberer Nummerierung aufzuschließen/Adapt page numbering
%Glossar/Glossary
\glssetwidest{A D A S} % gleicher Abstand zur 2. Spalte (längstes Wort)
% \setglossarystyle{alttree}
% \glsaddall
\printglossaries
\cleardoublepage
% Glossar/Glossary
\glssetwidest{A D A S} % gleicher Abstand zur 2. Spalte (längstes Wort)
% \setglossarystyle{alttree}
% \glsaddall
\printglossaries
\cleardoublepage
%Abbildungsverzeichnis/List of figures
\renewcommand*\listfigurename{List of figures} % Remove for German thesis
\listoffigures
\cleardoublepage
% Abbildungsverzeichnis/List of figures
\renewcommand*\listfigurename{List of figures} % Remove for German thesis
\listoffigures
\cleardoublepage
%Tabellenverzeichnis/List of tables
\renewcommand*\listtablename{List of tables} % Remove for German thesis
\listoftables
\cleardoublepage
% Tabellenverzeichnis/List of tables
\renewcommand*\listtablename{List of tables} % Remove for German thesis
\listoftables
\cleardoublepage
%Literaturliste/Literature references
% \bibliographystyle{abbrvdin} % DIN-Norm für Literaturdarstellung plaindin
\renewcommand{\refname}{Literature references} % Remove for German thesis
\printbibliography
\cleardoublepage
% Literaturliste/Literature references
% \bibliographystyle{abbrvdin} % DIN-Norm für Literaturdarstellung plaindin
\renewcommand{\refname}{Literature references} % Remove for German thesis
\printbibliography
\cleardoublepage
%Anhänge/Appendices
% \include{appendices}
% \cleardoublepage
% Anhänge/Appendices
% \include{appendices}
% \cleardoublepage
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----------------DOKUMENTENENDE - END OF DOCUMENT------------------------------------
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ----------------DOKUMENTENENDE - END OF DOCUMENT------------------------------------
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\end{document}